Now we are looking on the crossword clue for: Corporate big shot, for short.
it’s A 30 letters crossword puzzle definition.
Next time, try using the search term ” Corporate big shot, for short crossword” or ” Corporate big shot, for short crossword clue” when searching for help with your puzzle on the web. See the possible answers for Corporate big shot, for short below.
Did you find what you needed?
We hope you did!. If you are still unsure with some definitions, don’t hesitate to search them here with our crossword puzzle solver.
Possible Answers:
Exec.
Last seen on: Daily Celebrity Crossword – 9/29/20 TV Tuesday
Random information on the term ” Exec”:
An executive officer (CCE) is generally a person responsible for running an organization, although the exact nature of the role varies depending on the organization. In many militaries, an executive officer, or “XO”, is the second-in-command, reporting to the commanding officer. The XO is typically responsible for the management of day-to-day activities, freeing the commander to concentrate on strategy and planning the unit’s next move.
While there is no clear line between executive or principal and inferior officers, principal officers are high-level officials in the executive branch of U.S. government such as department heads of independent agencies. In Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), the Court distinguished between executive officers and quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial officers by stating that the former serve at the pleasure of the president and may be removed at his discretion. The latter are removed only with procedures consistent with statutory conditions enacted by Congress. The decision by the Court was that the Federal Trade Commission was a quasi-legislative body because of other powers it had, and therefore, the president could not fire an FTC member for political reasons. Congress can’t retain removal power over officials with executive function (Bowsher v. Synar). However, statutes can restrict removal if not purely executive (Humphrey’s executor), but can’t restrict removal of purely executive officer (Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926)). The standard is whether restriction “impedes the president’s ability to perform his constitutional duty” (Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988)).